View Full Version : lower?
Derek@amazon
04-28-2010, 09:31 AM
i can go down about 2 more inches in the front. not sure if i wanna rake it that much though. its gunna get raked more once i get the new rears
http://i383.photobucket.com/albums/oo279/SRTthis798/88%20stang/IMG00372.jpg
http://i383.photobucket.com/albums/oo279/SRTthis798/88%20stang/IMG00374.jpg
nitrostangracin
04-28-2010, 09:34 AM
Why? Appearance is always important. However, lowering a car that much destroys suspension components
Derek@amazon
04-28-2010, 09:37 AM
the looks is about it...
i think the big gap in the front is from the shorter tires and when i throw the rears up front and get taller rears it will even things out more looks wise
nitrostangracin
04-28-2010, 09:52 AM
the looks is about it...
i think the big gap in the front is from the shorter tires and when i throw the rears up front and get taller rears it will even things out more looks wise
I would try that. Honestly drops that severe are bad for daily driven cars as the front suspension gets beat up real bad. You really need to think is the appearance worth the expense it will take to fix my future issues!
Derek@amazon
04-28-2010, 10:25 AM
that is a good point.
**** 50 series tires.
91FiveO
04-28-2010, 02:33 PM
I lowered mine about 1.5"-2.0" and it is on the stock 16" ponies with 225/55/16. I have lowered all (3) of my Stangs, I do have to be careful of the exhaust now but... I love the looks!!!
http://i793.photobucket.com/albums/yy213/dwcaudle/Mustangs/91Mustang005a.jpg
wick22
04-30-2010, 02:24 PM
I lowered mine about 1.5"-2.0" and it is on the stock 16" ponies with 225/55/16. I have lowered all (3) of my Stangs, I do have to be careful of the exhaust now but... I love the looks!!!
http://i793.photobucket.com/albums/yy213/dwcaudle/Mustangs/91Mustang005a.jpg
this looks perfect
vBulletin® v3.7.5, Copyright ©2000-2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.